Call +61 403 600 248

International Coach Academy

Coach Training School

  • Regions
    • USA & Latin America
    • Canada
    • Asia
    • Australia & NZ
    • United Kingdom
    • Europe
    • Africa
    • India
    • Middle East
  • Language
    • English
    • Italiano
    • 课程选择
  • Contact
  • OUR SCHOOL
    • Training Methodology
    • Our Story
    • Faculty
  • PROGRAMS
    • Advanced (150hrs)
    • Professional (125 hrs)
    • Vocational (76 hrs)
    • Workplace (60 hrs)
    • Bridging (BYO prior training)
    • Alumni (Lifetime Member)
  • STUDENT LIFE
    • Learning Online
    • Flexible Schedules
    • Industry Experience
    • Your Coaching Model
    • Your Coaching Niche
    • FlipIt Coaching Framework
    • Business Building
  • COACHCAMPUS
    • Inside CoachCampus
    • ICA Coaches
    • Graduate Yearbooks
    • Student Support
  • RESOURCES
    • What is Coaching?
    • Certification & Credential Guide
    • Coaching Power Tools
    • Coaching Models
    • Coaching Research
    • Library
    • ICA Blog
  • Join Login

Articles, Case Studies & Interviews

You are here: Home » COACH PORTFOLIOS » Research Papers » Research Paper: Execution: Coaching for Results

Research Paper: Execution: Coaching for Results

2012/09/18

Bossidy and Charan (2002) call this ‘the gap nobody knows about’ – the gap between promises and results, the gap of execution. Defining execution as a systematic way of exposing reality and acting on it, the authors argue that most people do not face reality very well, hence they cannot execute. Further, they argue that the heart of execution lies in three processes: people, strategy, and operations. However, most organizations face several underlying problems: lack of commitment, lack of accountability, and a preoccupation with what they perceive as ‘real work’. McChesney, Covey and Huling (2012) came to very similar conclusions years later. McChesney, et al (2012) referring to over seven years of research with over 1500 organizations, present what they found to be the leading enemies of execution.

These were:

  • Lack of clarity of the goal or objective
  • Lack of commitment to the goal
  • Lack of accountability

These were the common ones, but the real problem, they argue, lay hidden in plain sight. This was the demands from daily routine which they call the whirlwind. The whirlwind of daily activity robs one the ability to focus on new activity needed to achieve new goals. This is because the whirlwind involves urgency while the new goals and activities involve importance. When urgency clashes with importance, urgency always wins.

These findings have near-revolutionary implications for coaching as discussed below. Indeed, this writer argues that it is only coaching as a discipline that offers a substantive solution to the knowing-doing problem.

AIDING EXECUTION THROUGH COACHING

Peel (2005) says research validates the assertion that learning takes place when goals are set, action is taken, and constructive review of those actions are carried out. In other words, when people know exactly what is expected of them, they take action to realize desired results, and they are held accountable for their actions, then learning happens. In this case it could be argued that learning has not really happened unless it leads to a change in behavior. This change of behavior is evidenced by the actions taken and the results achieved.

Coaching focuses on helping the client become more aware of himself or herself and the view they hold on the situation at hand. This awareness helps in developing clarity which then leads to identification of solutions and the attendant actions. The coach then helps to enthuse the client to more keenly desire to get to the desired result, thereby building commitment to the defined result. Thereafter the coach facilitates accountability for action and results. It follows that the process of coaching, indeed more than any other management discipline, lends itself well to curing the problem of non-execution with individuals. Given that individuals make up organizations, and that individuals in organizations are the ones that execute, it means if coaching is applied to an organization, this would enhance organizational execution as well.

It is, however, critical, that the coach is aware of the underlying default tendency, and the danger it poses to moving the client forward. The tendency to revert back to status quo and lose sight of intended goal and actions due to the pressure of ‘normal work’ is real. In addressing this challenge, the coach must help the client beware of this tendency and, together with the client, articulate a strategy to mitigate against it. As McChesney, et al (2012) suggest, the solution may lie in their four disciplines, namely: focusing on the wildly important, working with lead measures, keeping a scorecard, and facilitating accountability. The coach could therefore help the client establish priorities, articulate how he or she will keep track of progress, set some milestones, and agree on terms of accountability. In this way, the coach gets the client on a firm path towards execution.

CONCLUSION

Coaching is a nascent discipline. It needs to prove itself in the market and this can only be done through delivery of results. In delivering results, coaches ought to be aware of the real challenge that the knowing-doing gap presents. However, it is in this challenge that lay the opportunity for coaching in that, while other disciplines have no clear way of dealing with the challenge, the very design of the coaching process renders itself as a direct solution to inaction. However, it is the default tendency to be lost in the ‘whirlwind’ that coach must actively address in order to ensure victory over the knowing-doing challenge.

shadow-ornament

References

Bossidy, L and Charan, R (2002). Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done. London: Random House Business Books.
Eric Parsloe (1999). The Manager as Coach and Mentor (2nd Ed.). London: CIPD Publishing.
Grant, A. M. (1999). Enhancing performance through coaching: The promise of CBT. Paper presented at the First State Conference of the Australian Association of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (NSW).
International Coach Federation (2012). 2012 ICF Global Coaching Study. www.coachfederation.org.
McChesney,C, Covey,S and Huling,J (2012). The 4 Disciplines of Execution: Achieving Your Wildly Important Goals. NewYork, NY: Free Press
Peel, D, (2005). The Significance of Behavioral Learning Theory to the Development of Effective Coaching Practice. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring. Volume 3, Number 1, P18.
Pfeffer, J and Sutton, R.I. (2000). The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge Into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Pages: 1 2

Filed Under: Research Papers Tagged With: become a coach, coaching for results, kagunda chege, leadership coach kenya

How We Train

 

Read More About e-Learning at ICA

Course Guide

Fill out my online form.

Search

Categories

About Our School

Become a Coach
Coaching Niches & Specialities
Our Methodology
Faculty
Class Schedules
Online Community

 

Resources

What is Coaching?
Certification & Credentialing Guide
Graduate Research Papers
Graduate Yearbooks

Locations/Contact

Global: Clik Collective
Asia: Duo Tower
Postal: PO Box 3190 Mentone East,
Melbourne AUSTRALIA, 3194

Email: [email protected]
Questions: Ask here

Copyright © 2023 · International Coach Academy ·

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • OUR SCHOOL
    • Training Methodology
    • Our Story
    • Faculty
    • Back
  • PROGRAMS
    • Advanced (150hrs)
    • Professional (125 hrs)
    • Vocational (76 hrs)
    • Workplace (60 hrs)
    • Bridging (BYO prior training)
    • Alumni (Lifetime Member)
    • Back
  • STUDENT LIFE
    • Learning Online
    • Flexible Schedules
    • Industry Experience
    • Your Coaching Model
    • Your Coaching Niche
    • FlipIt Coaching Framework
    • Business Building
    • Back
  • COACHCAMPUS
    • Inside CoachCampus
    • ICA Coaches
    • Graduate Yearbooks
    • Student Support
    • Back
  • RESOURCES
    • What is Coaching?
    • Certification & Credential Guide
    • Coaching Power Tools
    • Coaching Models
    • Coaching Research
    • Library
    • ICA Blog
    • Back